Posted: November 30 2009
An e-mail promotion by the UCD Students’ Union Ents Office was
found to have breached the MEAS
Code of Practice on the Naming, Packaging and Promotion of Alcoholic Drinks
recently.
The e-mail, sent to UCD students, stated:
“UCD Ents Presents Black Week…
Monday 7th Sept. – Black Monday
UCD Ents suggests…
BREAKFAST – Couch, (Can of dutch/bottle of buckfast)
LUNCH – Student Bar, UCD (Fosters)
DINNER (Pint of guinness/bottle of vodka)
AFTERPARTY
Some shitty little place that sells booze after hours
Drink til you puke/pass out with your shoes on/get cocks drawn on
face
His/hers/yours (for a tug)
Morning after
Regret/Hangover/Who the fuck is he/she
Wednesday 9th Sept. -
The Official UCD Ents Junior Cert Results Party w/ Bodyrox @ The
Student Bar (Yeah! Yeah!) - come and celebrate Junior Cert Results Night in the
bar with more alcohol than you drank when you actually got your Junior Cert
Results!! (Tickets 5 euro)
Sunday 13th Sept. -
residENTS presents - Centre Club Sundays - Drop the bags, down the
pints - start your week as you mean to go on!
Tickets for all gigs available @ www.ucdents.com
REMEMBER YOU'RE HERE FOR A GOOD TIME - NOT A LONG TIME!”
The Panel noted that the
MEAS Guidance Notes on Point of Sale Promotions and Materials and Serving of
Multiple Drinks state that “promotions…identified
and agreed to be those that should not be run as they are either unlawful, or
entail a disproportionate risk that they will lead directly to alcohol misuse
and anti-social behaviour” include “drinking
games – these tend to encourage either rapid drinking or the drinking of large
quantities of alcohol and therefore should not be run”…”promotions that
encourage or reward the purchase of drinking large quantities of alcohol in a
single session”… “promotions that encourage either an excessive drinking
session or a pub crawl”.
The promotion ran from 7th to 13th September this year and the Panel noted the
overall tenor of the e-mail and in particular the aspects of the promotion that
referred to the “Afterparty” and
“Junior Cert Results Party”. The
Panel felt that these specific aspects of the promotion suggested an
association with anti-social behaviour and sexual prowess.
The Panel also considered that the e-mail encouraged students to
engage in excessive alcohol consumption, not only in specific venues and on
specific days, but right across the entire week and on an ongoing basis.
But the Panel was pleased to note the correspondence from the UCD
Students’ Union President which stated that the e-mail “content was
inappropriate”, “did not follow [the
Students’ Union] standard
communications procedures” and
that “a review of procedures would take place to ensure that it would not
happen again.” |